AKG D112 vs Shure Beta 52 | Which Bass Drum Microphone Is Better?

Your drumming is decent, which microphone will do you justice. AKG D112 vs Shure Beta 52A. Choosing a bass microphone is quite a big challenge for many bands out there making music today. This article looks at two of the best products that you can buy in this market category. This includes the quality, durability, and versatility that they can offer you as a consumer. 

We will compare frequencies they can handle and how best this suits various musical artists to analyze these products. In the end, we will look at some of the features that the product shares and any significant differences. I hope that by the end of the article you will know which is the best option for you to buy.

AKG D112

This is a versatile microphone designed to handle music sounds in a more calculated and appropriate fashion. The microphone weighs just over 0.6 kilograms meaning that it is more of a stationary mic than one designed for you to move around with. 

This is, therefore, more applicable to use in a live setting where there is a band playing music. It can also work in the studio environment. For you to set this microphone down safely, they have included an integrated, flexible Mount that means you can catch music from the most comfortable angle. 

It comes with one of the deepest bass resonance chambers that allows you to record music exactly how it sounds, but without sacrificing the bass, you get. It is a microphone that is appropriate for people who sing from the diaphragm. 

Since they have designed it to accept low accurate frequencies, it is perfect for people who need to minimize the additional noise to get the crisp sound. The manufacturers have also included an integrated compensation coil that works very well to cancel out noise. It is a very reliable brand that has been in the market for over 30 years, and it has a frequency range of between 20 Khz – 17 Khz. 

Pros

• Versatile mounting options
• Noise-canceling
• A deep bass resonance chamber

Cons

• Not mobile

Shure Beta 52A

This is a product that has been built to offer quality and consistency to the consumer. It has been explicitly designed to deal with bass instruments. Therefore, if you are in a band and looking for a microphone to record with when making music, this is a good option. 

It comes with a fully adaptable XLR setup that works very well to provide you with a high studio-quality performance. You will be entirely comfortable using this because of the Super cardioid pattern that has been well thought of to provide you with excellent noise-canceling features. 

It is made with a steel mesh that has been further hard and to provide you with adequate protection against the elements. You can therefore expect that this product will last you for quite some time. It has an innovative and valuable pneumatic shock mount system that allows you to move around while recording without the microphone picking up additional noise. 

The high signal-to-noise ratio is a testament to this because the mic can follow your voice. This might be since it has been built with a low sensitivity impedance. The low-frequency-based punch is essentially essential when dealing with dynamic microphones because it allows you to preserve the most profound sounds that an instrument can make. This means that your sounds will sound less digital and more natural when they come out in production. 

Pros

• Steel mesh finish
• High signal to noise ratio
• Can handle very low frequencies.

Cons

• High frequencies are not handled well. 

Favorite Features

Noise-canceling

The noise-canceling features on both products are pretty impressive and deserve good mention. If we had to choose the superior one, it would be the Shure option because it has been designed with an advanced pneumatic shock system that works to ensure no mechanical sounds are recorded except for the instruments you are playing. This is an excellent feature to have, especially for bands whereby it is expected that there are a few human movements to produce music. 

Durability

Both products are pretty durable, given that they are made from stainless steel. However, the Shure product has been designed with a Harden steel mesh grill that will survive the years without rusting. 

You can guarantee that this is a more hygienic and durable option for you to purchase. This is important especially for people who run their studios because it can become quite costly to replace these microphones given how much they cost continuously. 

Sound Ability 

Most undoubtedly, the essential parts of any microphone are its sound ability. The microphone with the superior-based technology between these two options here is the AKG D112. This product has been designed with a significant volume chamber that can handle intense bass. 

This makes it excellent for people that want to perform with large-diaphragm sounds. You will efficiently handle very low frequencies due to the integrated compensation coil, which works very hard to protect the sound your instruments are making from vibrations. 

What could be better?

AKG D112

The versatility of this microphone could have been improved. It can only be used in a mounted position and weighs quite a substantial amount for a microphone. 

Shure Beta 52A

Improvements in the frequency handling abilities would have made this microphone top tier. 

Similar Features

Both products have superior noise-canceling features. 

Key Differences 

The main difference between these two products is the versatility they offer. The AKG D112 provides better sound quality, although it is less versatile. The Shure Beta 52A Has better durability and has been built with a steel mesh grille.

The Verdict

In conclusion, both products are good options to consider, especially for people who perform in live bands. The Shure option slightly outperforms the AKG D112 because it has better sound quality and can handle deeper basses. I would recommend this option for people who want to make music in the studio. This is because the product is less versatile and cannot move around as much. If you prefer a more flexible microphone in terms of its mobility, you should go with the AKG D112.